I just knew we
would be hearing
from a lot of
women who
had sat there
through the Anita
Hill testimony
and said, ‘She’s
right; we should
not put up with
this.’ And that,
in fact, is what
happened.”
—SNYDER
coast of Belize in the way of making their
escape. They had engine trouble and ended
up having to go ashore in an isolated jungle
area [and] were stranded for several days.
The father ultimately walked out, found
people and was able to rescue the family,
got a car … and was ultimately apprehended
trying to enter Canada.
He was criminally prosecuted, convicted and
sentenced to jail; and through that process,
we learned that his mother had funded this
escapade of kidnapping. I was determined
to help [my client], who not only had had
months not knowing where her children were
but [had spent] every penny she could scrape
together. [I] pursued a civil claim against the
grandmother, which was hotly contested
because it involved lots of conflicting legal
issues. [But when] the case indeed was going
to go to trial, the grandmother decided it was
in her best interest to come up with the money
to settle the case.
Q: What did your family think of your
decision to go into law?
A: My mother was extremely supportive
because, when she graduated from high
school, she had opportunities to go on to
study, but because of her family’s financial
circumstances they could not afford to send
her to college. My father was supportive
but mystified. [Laughs] He might have been
considered to have more traditional values
for what women were expected to do, but he
never did anything to present any obstacles.
Although I was very grateful that I got a
full scholarship to go to the University of
Notre Dame School of Law, my parents also
provided financial support to the extent that
they were able to. It was greatly appreciated,
because then I got out of law school without
the burden of debt, and I was able to plot my
own course.
Q: In 1973 it was still relatively rare for a
woman to become an attorney. What was
that like?
A: It was unusual in terms of just the
raw numbers of women in the practice of
law. There were some examples [of role
models], but there also were significant
obstacles, because it really was still a
very unique role for a woman. When I was
clerking for [U.S. District] Judge [Otto]
Skopil and was out looking for my first
position, I had assumed that I would go
to a traditional medium- to large-size
law firm, and those opportunities were
not offered to me when I was focusing
on a litigation practice. But the district
attorney’s office for Multnomah County
at that point was [undergoing] a lot of
growth, a lot of hiring. The district attorney
was Harl Haas. He was very committed to
hiring women, and he had single-handedly
been responsible for hiring many, many
women who went on to develop litigation
careers as a result of decisions he made
in the early- to mid-’70s. Many of the fine
women litigators we now recognize as
litigators, or who are now judges, were as
a result of Harl Haas’ decision to hire. I
ended up going to the district attorney’s
office because it gave me that opportunity
to do litigation that was not offered to me
in private practice.
Q: You started your own firm in 1978.
A: I made a conscious decision that I wasn’t
going to go through that process again
[of] trying to persuade people to offer
me a job as a litigator. [So] I went out on
my own when I left the district attorney’s
office. I had a solo practice from March
of 1978 until approximately 1981, when
I hired my first associate. She was fresh
out of law school. Eve [Miller] ultimately
became a partner in the firm [after I went
into] partnership with Ron Hoevet. Ron and
I became law partners in approximately
1983. And now she is a judge.
Q: What was it like having your own firm as
a young woman?
A: When I left the district attorney’s office
with absolutely no client base, I went
into an office-share arrangement with
two attorneys, one of whom primarily did
business and the other primarily did real
estate. They were looking for someone
who would litigate the cases on behalf of
their clients, so that was very valuable. The
other thing I did is I accepted a part-time
contract at juvenile court; I just did that for
about six months in order to have some cash
coming in. I, at that point in time, had been
a litigator in the district attorney’s office for
about four years, so I was fairly well-known
because I’d been pretty aggressive and
active, particularly doing felony litigation. So
clients were referred to me. Initially, it was
largely referrals in the family law area, which
was not an area of law that I’d planned on
practicing in.
And then in 1992 I stopped taking domestic
relations cases, in part because my civil